I got my left ear pierced for christmas. [WHOOO HOOO!!!!!]

...

Oh and Manda, i got you the mini penguin water dispenser, amazing huh! =P

haha okay and i watched this movie uhhh

This movie uuuuhhhhhhh...


Zooey Deschanel !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <3333333

she was the reason i wanted to watch Yes man and i think it was totally worth it ;P

AHHHHHHHHHHHH i dont know why but i think she's so awesome ^^

Ever since she acted as Trillian in the Hitchhiker's guide.. hehheh. i dont know... its like, ive this thing for crazy girls.

...uh huh.

Ah well! Good day today, good day... (:

Not so sure about tomorrow. My dad's coming back. YEAH he missed christmas and is returning just the day after -_______-


Hmm.Got more socks today.

And Merry Christmas everyone!
:D

Well, you know, Gazette, its not like I listen to there music or anything, but since October after eoys, Sihui and Liz got me into those Youtube videos...

Urghhh ohmygod...

IM ADDICTED.

Basically it was just harmless Uruha image surfing... [okay absolutely Not harmless, he's so Freaking GORGEOUS it makes you weep i mean, seriously]

Im addicted to Gazette videos, its sooo,

OKAY IM PUTTING A RANDOM LINK

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpYqJoO3l_4&NR=1
... puts spaghetti in a different light :D

Its so funny all this silly videos but you know how they're like hot and sexy..., yeah?

-Kai has this uber cute smile super uber cute ><

I remember how i liked Reita first, with the cool nose-cover thing, then I saw Uruha's beauty

its like looking at Tokio Hotel thinking first that Tom's better then realising Bill's perfect features
Yeah. Uruha's gorgeous, -nose bleed-

He's got, what, impossible legs omg~

Edwardcullen isnt a god, man, Uruha is

He's so so so so so pretty its crazy.

To think such a beautiful person can possibly exist in this cruel world~...

... Right im boring you huh. Im getting bored here anyway posting ahahahahahaa

But please please please google Uruha if you have no idea how he looks like, because once you do you wont regret it, because he is SO -

alright alright i'll stop :P

URUHA URUHA URUHA

URUHA URUHA URUHA!!!!!!!!!

okaybyebye ><

its Brilliant. i cant ever cosplay anything like that [i mean Goku]


(but its not like manda can do Sanzo either hehehehhh..)


andro is too psycho froggie to do Kougaiji,


... but linsha can do Zakuro . yep.


... ... ...


why hasnt anyone one mentioned it? linsha's PERFECT for Zakuro!


MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHA. MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

" It was not truly clear that the series was over (since it was already a trilogy with five books) until Adams died of a heart attack at age 49 in 2001. Indeed, Adams said that the new novel he was working on, The Salmon of Doubt, was not working as a Dirk Gently story, and suggested it might instead become a sixth book in the Hitchhiker's series. He described Mostly Harmless in an interview as "a very bleak book" and said he "would love to finish Hitchhiker on a slightly more upbeat note". Adams also remarked that if he were to write a sixth instalment, he would at least start with all the characters in the same place. "

-wiki


HOW COULD YOU DOUGLAS ADAMS? HOW COULD YOU JUST DIE?????
NO NOOOOOO I HATE YOU I HATE YOU
ALRIGHT I DONT, I THINK YOU'RE A GENIUS
BUT A HEART ATTACK?? WHAT DID YOU, SMOKE?
i bet Marvin came along and depressed you into it. but thats no reason to die! (???)
Eoin Colfer's gonna write it for us.
Please ensure he does a good job or we'll slam him
like put the fish in his ear and ghostspeak to him or whatever
if not, send us electric monks
they'll do fine too

Numbers, i think you would agree, are properties of things.

If numbers are properties of things, what then, are they properties of?



There are three chickens. What is the number 3, property of?


The chicken? No.Each chicken is one.
The chickens? No, that'll be the group of them, and a group is one single entity. [eg, a flock of birds]



So unless you can decide on what 3 is property of, you cannot associate 3 with the chickens.

taken off wiki

"The trolley problem is a thought experiment in ethics, first introduced by Philippa Foot."

HA.foot! what a last name!

" The problem is this:
A trolley is running out of control down a track. In its path are 5 people who have been tied to the track by a mad philosopher. Fortunately, you can flip a switch which will lead the trolley down a different track to safety. Unfortunately, there is a single person tied to that track. Should you flip the switch? "

nice eh?

"The initial trolley problem becomes more interesting when it is compared to other moral dilemmas. "


The fat man
One such is that offered by Judith Jarvis Thomson:
As before, a trolley is hurtling down a track towards five people. You are on a bridge under which it will pass, and you can stop it by dropping a heavy weight in front of it. As it happens, there is a very fat man next to you - your only way to stop the trolley is to push him over the bridge and onto the track, killing him to save five. Should you proceed? ]

"Resistance to this course of action seems strong; most people who approved of sacrificing one to save five in the first case do not approve in the second sort of case. This has led to attempts to find a non-relevant moral distinction between the two cases. "

which is wrong-er?

" ...argues that an essential difference between the original trolley problem and this version with the fat man, is that in the first case, you merely deflect the harm, whereas in the second case, you have to do something to the fat man to save the five. Thomson says that in the first case, nobody has any more right than anyone else not to be run over, but in the second case, the fat man has a right not to be pushed in front of the trolley."

what?
i would think the pushing act is wronger
the person, in being tied to the track, would be mentally prepared
the fat man isn't.
but how is being mentally prepared a good distinction for wrong or wronger?
should we be analyzing what each of them has done in there lives to decide?

then again, hows a trolley supposed to kill? substitute it with a train i say.

Transplant

" Here is an alternate case, due to Thompson, containing similar numbers and results, but without a trolley:

A brilliant transplant surgeon has five patients, each in need of a different organ, each of whom will die without that organ. Unfortunately, there are no organs available to perform any of these five transplant operations. A healthy young traveler, just passing through the city the doctor works in, comes in for a routine checkup. In the course of doing the checkup, the doctor discovers that his organs are compatible with all five of his dying patients. Suppose further that if the young man were to disappear, no one would suspect the doctor.

As rare as it is to find someone who does not think we should turn the trolley, it is even rarer to find someone who thinks it is permissible for the doctor to murder this patient and harvest his organs. "

how about that this five people are gonna die really soon (as with the trolley case) and this man is their only chance?do you murder?
although the case is just the same, saving 5 by sacrificing 1, most who had opted flicking the switch would, however, express disgust with this similar option of murdering the traveller.

and they would be hypocrites.

_

"If intuitions about quantum black holes are correct, then close to the Planck mass the number of possible quantum states of the black hole is expected to become so few and so quantised that its interactions are likely to be quenched out. It is possible that such Planck-mass black holes, no longer able either to absorb energy gravitationally like a Classical black hole because of the quantised gaps between their allowed energy levels, nor to emit Hawking particles for the same reason, may in effect be stable objects. "

-wiki

stable micro black holes!(:

i hate the second law of thermodynamics
someone had better come up with a better thought experiment than Maxwell's demon soon